Touch the screen or click to continue...
Checking your browser...
sumyarn.pages.dev


David wood vs ali ataie biography

          The main objective of this debate was to take a critical look at the prophet of Islam, Muhammad..

          The main objective of this debate was to take a critical look at the prophet of Islam, Muhammad. David Wood, the Christian apologist, began the debate with a warning that "this is not going to be pretty" and that this would be no "interfaith picnic." He foreshadowed two-hours of swift, aggressive jousting between two apologists that was enjoyable to the end.

          David Wood Debates Ali Ataie on "Who Was Muhammad?" ﷺ David Wood features on many Christian videos on the Acts17Apologetics channel and is.

        1. While Wood and Ataie could agree on the historicity of certain issues (such as the murder of Ka'b bin Al-Ashraf that was sanctioned by Muhammad and Muhammad's.
        2. The main objective of this debate was to take a critical look at the prophet of Islam, Muhammad.
        3. The importance of understanding the source of Islam and not believing the hype is emphasized, as well as issues with the holy Prophet's biography and his name.
        4. In a debate with David Wood, Ali Ataie a Muslim Apologist was trying to deny a narration that David cited in the Hadith about how Muhammad.
        5. One prominent feature of this debate was the personal nature of the material as it related to the two men. For Wood, the material was based on the study of Islam he labored through with his best friend Nabeel, who was a Muslim.

          For Ali Ataie, the Muslim apologist, the material was central to his own beloved faith.

          Wood opened with three hard lines of evidence to support his overall argument: 1) Reasons why Christians reject Muhammad as a prophet, 2) The dismantling of two popular arguments for establishing Muhammad as a prophet of Islam: the arguments from scientific evidence and from literary excellence, an